Linda Shuts Down MALU Stake Pool and Retires as Cardano DRep

Linda, known in the Cardano community as @Cryptofly777, said MALU Stake Pool will close after five years of operation. The pool minted 7,419 blocks, supported more than 30 ISPOs and projects, and became part of a wider community discussion around Cardano stake pool sustainability.

By SongMarketCap

Cardano News - Linda Shuts Down MALU Stake Pool and Retires as Cardano DRep

Linda, a Cardano content creator and operator of MALU Stake Pool, has announced that she will shut down the pool and retire as a DRep after five years. In her post, she said MALU minted 7,419 blocks and supported more than 30 ISPOs and projects during that period.

The announcement prompted responses from delegators and Cardano community members who thanked her for years of work across staking, education and ecosystem support. Linda also asked users to redelegate their ADA, making the update directly relevant for delegators who had assigned stake or governance trust to MALU.

MALU Stake Pool Ends After Five Years

MALU was presented through its official site as a Cardano stake pool with the ticker MALU, connected to the broader Maluiin Pool initiative. The project described its mission as supporting connectivity and education for West Papuan mountain communities through renewable energy and uncensored internet access.

The Maluiin Pool site identifies Linda as the stake pool operator and NFT artist behind the project. Her public profile has long connected Cardano staking, content creation and community work, with MALU operating as a single operator pool rather than a large multipool structure.

Linda’s announcement also included her retirement as a DRep. In Cardano governance, DReps receive delegated voting power from ADA holders and vote on governance actions on their behalf. Cardano’s governance process keeps those funds in the user’s wallet while voting power is delegated, which makes the role separate from custody but still important for governance representation.

Cardano Stake Pool Rewards Depend on Delegation and Reserves

Cardano staking allows ADA holders to delegate stake to a pool or operate a pool themselves. The amount of stake delegated to a pool is one of the main factors that determines how likely that pool is to be selected to produce blocks and receive rewards.

Cardano rewards come from transaction fees and monetary expansion from remaining reserves. Official Cardano supply data shows that reserves declined from 7.41 billion ADA in epoch 539 to 6.30 billion ADA in epoch 638, a decrease of 15.01% between February 2025 and June 2026. The same dashboard states that Cardano mainnet had distributed 50% of reserves by January 2026.

That structure matters for smaller stake pool operators because pool income depends on delegated stake, produced blocks, pool fees, margins and the available reward pot. Cardano documentation also states that operators can deduct running costs from awarded ADA and set a profit margin for providing the service, which means pool economics are shaped by both network incentives and operator costs.

Delegators Face a New Choice After MALU Closure

Linda did not say that MALU is closing because of reward pressure, ADA price or reserve decline. The confirmed facts are narrower, the pool is closing after five years, Linda is retiring as a DRep, MALU minted 7,419 blocks and more than 30 ISPOs and projects were supported.

The wider community discussion around the post reflects a broader issue for Cardano staking, especially for smaller and community led pools. Cardano’s model depends on reliable stake pool operators, active delegators and a distribution of stake that avoids excessive concentration. The official staking documentation describes stake pools as participants that need to ensure consistent node uptime, while delegation can be moved to another pool at any time.

For MALU delegators, the immediate next step is practical rather than symbolic. Stake can be redelegated to another Cardano pool, while governance users who delegated voting power to Linda will also need to choose how they want to be represented in future governance actions. The closure of MALU therefore marks both the end of a five year community pool and a fresh delegation decision for the users who supported it.